Delhi Masterplan- MPD- 2021 
Follow Me!

Site last updated on 28 July, 2010 @ 2:51 pm

Comments

Please add your com­ments in the com­ment box below:

49 Comments »

  1. Comment by T sbabbart — May 25, 2010 @ 12:02 am

    sir i would like to know that can i run my real estate shop in res­id­ental colo­ney in 20 sq mtr under mas­ter plan 2021.

    Reply  — Quote
  2. Comment by surender — May 8, 2010 @ 8:30 pm

    dear sir, what is the per­miss­ible height of each floor in delhi , how much extra height of floor is com­pound­able by MCD , Kindly help, I want to recon­struct my old House.

    Reply  — Quote
  3. Comment by Gautam Jain — February 12, 2010 @ 2:30 pm

    Sir I want to know when will the Zonal Plan of P-1 zone (Approx­im­ate time) will be noti­fied. Why all the Zonal Plans are tak­ing so much time to get notified.  

    Reply  — Quote
  4. Comment by Ajay Kumar — February 10, 2010 @ 11:36 am

    For the first time, today seen your this web­site. All the use­ful inform­a­tions are avail­able at hand. Really impress­ive. My querry is that I have read in your art­icle that the interests of vari­ous developers are at stake in Gur­gaon, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, etc. and they want to get delayed the devel­op­ment of the outer Delhi’s Zones. That is abso­lutely right. Is there any ray of hope in such a scen­ario that the DDA/Ministry of Urban Devel­op­ment will notify the zonal plans of L Zone in the near future or they’ll suc­ceed in keep­ing it in abey­ance indefinitely.

    Reply  — Quote
  5. Comment by sakhuja — January 29, 2010 @ 5:56 pm

    Dear sirWe have two acres of land avail­able for ( J V ) col­lab­or­a­tion facing metro sta­tion ( kirti nagar ) .look­ing for  reputed  builder“s for more  details kindly contact

    Reply  — Quote
  6. Comment by Dr.Sunil — January 19, 2010 @ 12:06 pm

    I am thor­oughly impressed with the web­site, and also the depth of under­stand­ing about the com­plex­it­ies when I spoke to Ramesh Menon. I am def­in­itely inter­ested in your villa pro­ject in Kan­jhawala and will con­tact you before com­ing. Thanks for the help

    Reply  — Quote
  7. Comment by Ruchi — November 26, 2009 @ 12:47 pm

    Reduc­tion of prices by some developers– Is this a smoke screen or a sus­tain­able meas­ure?
    In the past weeks, some developers have annouced dra­matic price reduc­tion, and some obstin­ate ones have made press releases of offer­ing apart­ments at as low as 5 lakhs per unit. Are these mere smoke screens to raise their hand too, or are these sus­tain­able busi­ness pro­pos­i­tions? Would the industry play­ers shed their intent for HUGE mar­gins, and start oper­at­ing at a more prac­tical level of ROI? Is this the begin­ning of the change in the mind­set of the developers, or just a tem­por­ary measure?

    Reply  — Quote
  8. Comment by xxxx — October 15, 2009 @ 10:56 am

    I head the busi­ness ver­tical for a IPC based out of Mum­bai and I check out your web­site for updates about the Delhi mas­ter plan. I must com­mend the writer and authors of this web­site for an extremely good job done. You would under­stand that I can­not be more open for busi­ness reas­ons, but I hope you would keep giv­ing us con­stant updates. con­grats again for the tre­mend­ous effort.

    Reply  — Quote
  9. Comment by Certes Realty — August 10, 2009 @ 11:22 am

    Dear Mr. Kalra,
    Fol­low­ing are our comments.

    a)We could com­ment author­it­at­ively only when we per­use through the spe­cif­ics of the prop­erty.
    b)As an advis­ory firm focussed on invest­ments under the MPD 2021, we would prefer not to dis­pense gen­eric level advice.
    c)We pre­sume that your ques­tion seeks to under­stand the com­mer­cial aspect of your prop­erty, based on the noti­fic­a­tion which spe­cifies road width. If so, please be informed that the gaz­ette noti­fic­a­tion issued by the gov­ern­ment dt. 12th Aug’ 2008 is con­di­tional (not a sweep­ing approval based one para­meter of road width) on the cur­rent zon­ing, con­struc­tion & occu­pancy cut off dates, land & FSI coverage-current Vs as determ­ined under draft MPD etc.

    Hence, our advise would be to obtain spe­cific inform­a­tion from the local office of the author­it­ies, SPECIFIC TO YOUR PROPERTY, rather than the gen­eric inform­a­tion based on road width.
    Hope this inform­a­tion is use­ful for you.

    Reply  — Quote
  10. Comment by Raj Kalra — August 10, 2009 @ 11:02 am

    I have a build­ing in raja garden on main road. I want to know the size of this road.

    Reply  — Quote
  11. Comment by Gautam Jain — August 10, 2009 @ 10:31 am

    We are eagerly wait­ing for Zonal Plans for Zone P-1 for noti­fic­a­tion.
    If you have any idea when the Zonal Plans will be noti­fied. We want to know the status of P-1 Zone Alipur Vil­lage regard­ing Agri­cul­ture Land & Lal Dora Land.
    Regards
    Gautam Jain

    Reply  — Quote
  12. Comment by Lalit — July 16, 2009 @ 10:45 am

    I want to know the status of houses 1 to 36o mahila colony gandhi nagar delhi 31.whether com­mer­cial or mixed land

    Reply  — Quote
  13. Comment by Ankur Bhargava — July 15, 2009 @ 5:01 pm

    Dear certes

    We would be grate­ful if you could give your inputs on our fol­low­ing queries.

    i) Can we build hotel/motel/resort in the green belt or rural area of Delhi?
    ii) What are the norms to build motels
    iii) Can we have com­mer­cial or shop­ping space within the resort?
    iv) What are the cur­rent norms and what kind of per­mis­sions are required.

    We would be grate­ful if you could send us your offi­cial quo­ta­tion for act­ing as con­sult­ants for this deal.
    –Ankur (M/s XXXXXXXXX Resorts ℗ Ltd

    Reply  — Quote
  14. Comment by Ruchika — July 15, 2009 @ 1:29 pm

    Came across this art­icle, thought to share it with other users.
    — —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — –
    Makeover plan will turn Delhi into max­imum city
    Delhi is poised for some sweep­ing changes if the new Mas­ter Plan 2021, passes its last hurdle — the Supreme Court’s scru­tiny. At the same time, much of its chaotic (some town plan­ners call it organic) growth will con­tinue with shops and offices dotting res­id­en­tial colon­ies.
    The ‘‘please-all’’ Plan, as Union urban devel­op­ment min­is­ter Jaipal Reddy described it, clears the way for taller build­ings which will bring in ‘redens­i­fic­a­tion’ of exist­ing colon­ies. The higher floor-area ratio (FAR) per­mit­ted by the Plan will allow most houses to go up to four floors.
    In fact, the build­ings can be taller — going up to 14 to 16 floors — if build­ers and developers are able to amal­gam­ate an area of at least 4,000 sq m so long they take care of three
    things: set up efflu­ent treat­ment plants so as to not choke up the sew­er­age sys­tem, put up solar pan­els to gen­er­ate some power and build under­ground park­ing space.
    Slums will go but not the slum­d­well­ers, if the gov­ern­ment keeps its prom­ise — as enun­ci­ated in the Plan doc­u­ment — to build highrise tene­ments where slums cur­rently sprawl. Each tene­ment will have a built-up accom­mod­a­tion of 25 sq m. The Plan prom­ises that 50% of all new dwell­ings in the city will be for the poor.
    At the same time, about 1,500 unau­thor­ised colon­ies were leg­al­ised by the Union cab­inet. This has been factored in the new Plan. How­ever, three upscale illegal colon­ies — Sainik Farms, Mahendru Enclave and Anant Ram Dairy have not been leg­al­ised yet. The final list of the leg­al­ised colon­ies has not been released as yet, nor the full Plan doc­u­ment.
    The Plan’s man­tra is to develop hous­ing through ‘‘a mix of redens­i­fic­a­tion, redevel­op­ment and cre­ation of new hous­ing in urban exten­sion of about 20,000 hec­tares’’. The accent will be on group hous­ing — in fact, only 10% of new land to be released will be for inde­pend­ent houses.
    The jury is still out on whether the new Plan will lead to the cre­ation of a world-class city. While some believe that it is a doc­u­ment motiv­ated mainly by polit­ical expedi­ency, oth­ers believe that the way the city has grown can’t be reversed alto­gether and the Plan, to that extent, is real­istic.
    The Plan will be sub­mit­ted to the Supreme Court as it has wanted to see for itself if the new Plan was merely a ploy to leg­al­ise all pre­vi­ous irreg­u­lar­it­ies, or whether it was actu­ally a blue­print for the city’s future growth.
    How­ever, Reddy said: ‘‘I am con­fid­ent that Mas­ter Plan 2021 will stand legal scru­tiny.’’
    While the mar­ket will vir­tu­ally ensure that much of the city will grow taller if the new FAR norms are allowed by the court, it is dif­fi­cult to assert that all slums will, indeed, go as their replace­ment by highrise tene­ments will depend on whether the gov­ern­ment actu­ally keeps its prom­ise and comes up with the money to build the tene­ments.
    An import­ant aspect of the new Plan is that it ends DDA’s mono­poly on land acquis­i­tion and devel­op­ment of hous­ing stock.
    Private developers have been encour­aged to amal­gam­ate land and develop them for hous­ing. Some ‘her­it­age’ areas, like Luty­ens’ Build­ing Zone, Nizamud­din area, Mehrauli area and Chirag Dilli, will be left untouched under the Plan.
    RISING CAPITAL
    The new Mas­ter Plan pro­poses to change the look of the city and also con­tinue with its chaotic (or organic) growth. It will kick in once it gets the Supreme Court’s nod
    Chan­ging City­scape
    The aver­age height of build­ings may go up to 4 floors as floor-area ratio has been increased There can be taller build­ings, up to 16 stor­ies, in colon­ies provided they have an efflu­ent treat­ment plant, solar pan­els and under­ground park­ing 1500 unau­thor­ised colon­ies leg­al­ised, but not high-profile Sainik Farms, Anant Ram Dairy and Mahendru Enclave Colon­ies around urban vil­lages mostly leg­al­ised. These areas likely to wit­ness a build­ing spurt Slums won’t be shif­ted. But the eye­sores may go. In place of slums, govt plans highrise tene­ments DDA’s mono­poly on land will end
    Relief From Court
    Shops allowed in colon­ies on ground floor; trade on all floors on com­mer­cial streets. A & B colon­ies can have shops up to 20 sq m
    Nurs­ing homes, dis­pens­ar­ies, clin­ics, banks, nurs­ery schools, guest houses, path labs allowed in colon­ies
    Base­ments OK for pro­fes­sional work in colon­ies, shops in com­mer­cial streets
    Apart from law­yers, doc­tors, CAs & archi­tects, engin­eers, co sec­ret­ar­ies, cost account­ants, town plan­ners, media pro­fes­sion­als & doc­u­ment­ary film makers can work out of home
    Non-conforming schools can con­tinue for 3 years, sub­ject to reg­u­lar­isa­tion. Coach­ing and tuition centres allowed in colonies

    Reply  — Quote
  15. Comment by Hindbir Dabas — June 23, 2009 @ 3:28 pm

    BJP prom­ises to extend Lal Dora. WOuld the Con­gress do so after win­ning?
    — —  —  —  — -
    Lal Dora of the vil­lages will be exten­ded: Jag­dish Mukhi
    New Delhi | Tues­day, Apr 7
    BJP can­did­ate for the West Delhi Par­lia­ment­ary con­stitu­ency Jag­dish Mukhi today said if the BJP-led NDA came to power, the Lal Dora of the vil­lages will be exten­ded and the land of the farm­ers acquired for import­ant Gov­ern­ment pro­jects only. Address­ing the pub­lic dur­ing cam­paign­ing in vil­lages in the West Delhi con­stitu­ency, Dr Mukhi said after Inde­pend­ence, the Lal Dora of the vil­lages has not been exten­ded till date, while with the pas­sage of time, the pop­u­la­tion of these areas has increased many fold, due to nat­ural growth of the vil­lages. ”The increased pop­u­la­tion due to the nat­ural growth has settled down on the out­skirts of the Lal Dora of the vil­lages.
    But due to neg­li­gence of the gov­ern­ment, that is non-extension of the Lal Dora, this pop­u­la­tion is being deprived even of the basic amen­it­ies and other facil­itie being provided by the gov­ern­ment to res­id­ents of Lal Dora of the vil­lages,” Dr Mukhi said.
    He added if the BJP comes to power, exten­sion of Lal Dora will be its top­most pri­or­ity, so that the people, who have settled bey­ond Lal Dora, could also avail the same facil­it­ies which are being enjoyed by the res­id­ents liv­ing in Lal Dora.
    Dr Mukhi said the Lal Dora has not been exten­ded due to neg­lect of the vil­lages by the Con­gress gov­ern­ment under the Urban Devel­op­ment Min­istry, but the BJP is firm to ful­fill its promises.

    Reply  — Quote
  16. Comment by Hindbir Dabas — June 23, 2009 @ 11:27 am

    This is a news I read. It might be use­ful for many more read­ers of this site.
    — —  —  — —
    Lt Gov­ernor Tejendra Khanna approved a pro­posal to extend Lal Dora to 41 vil­lages, enabling the res­id­ents of these areas to access sim­ilar facil­it­ies as being availed by their coun­ter­parts in urban areas.
    Devel­op­ment Min­is­ter Raj Kumar Chauhan told the report­ers here that increas­ing pop­u­la­tion of Delhi and urb­an­isa­tion of vil­lages has forced the gov­ern­ment to extend the Lal Dora which was intro­duced in 1908.
    Chauhan said the pop­u­la­tion of vil­lages was bur­geon­ing and so should all facil­it­ies. He said the LG has the right to extend the Lal Dora of any area under Sec­tion 23(3) of the Land Reform Act, 1954.
    Pind­wala Kalan, Dau­lat­pur, Rewala Khan­pur, Asal­at­pur Khavad, Kan­gan­heri, Shi­karpur, Pind­wala Khurd, Dar­iyapur Khurd, Daor­ala, Jhuljhuli in South Dis­trict, Mukh­malpur, Palla, Tajpur Kalan, Garhi Ran­dala, Jhatk­hor, Savada in North­w­est dis­trict and Badarur Khadar, Sabhapur Shahadara in East dis­trict are some of the vil­lages where Lal Dora has been exten­ded, the min­is­ter said.

    Reply  — Quote
  17. Comment by admin — June 19, 2009 @ 1:26 pm

    Dear Mr. Agar­wal,
    We have come across many such cases dur­ing our research and trans­ac­tions activ­ity.
    Since DDA was the sole agency in Delhi cre­at­ing the res­id­en­tial dwell­ing units, there was always a defi­cit between the demand and sup­ply. And a lot of home-seekers ended up buy­ing land / plots in unau­thor­ized colon­ies.
    Most of these unau­thor­ized colon­ies have come up on agri­cul­tural land par­cels, and are not author­ized for devel­op­ment of res­id­en­tial colon­ies. It is our obser­va­tion by trav­el­ling through your are that many a water con­nec­tions are either illeg­ally tapped, or, resort to inde­pend­ent bore-wells. Dur­ing 2008, there was an announce­ment by the Delhi gov­ern­ment to reg­u­lar­ize some colon­ies, provided cer­tain con­di­tions were met. As you would be aware, till date, there hasn’t been any con­crete action announced.
    There are a lot of myths sur­round­ing Lal Dora land. For the records, Lal Dora land means “Res­id­en­tial land”. It can be used for res­id­en­tial pur­poses. It is NOT AGRICULTURAL LAND. To our belief, Lal dora land, for self dwell­ing, is a much bet­ter, and safer option than buy­ing a plot in an unau­thor­ized colony, wherein the land usage is still Agri­cul­tural. Unless it is reg­u­lar­ized, and the land use changed to res­id­en­tial, the plot that you refer to remains illegal for con­struc­tion of a res­id­en­tial dwell­ing unit. You would also find dif­fi­culties in get­ting the build­ing sanc­tion approvals, as well as lever­age mort­gage to fin­ish the con­struc­tion.
    As for the exten­ded Lal Dora plots in Kan­jhawla, our research through peri­odic site vis­its, as well as the inform­a­tion gathered through the Right to inform­a­tion act, the Plots under Khasra num­ber 142 are announced res­id­en­tial plots. There are houses already built on the same. Of late, there has been increased quer­ies from developers seek­ing to build apartments/ mul­tiple DUs on the plot size meas­ur­ing 2100 sq. Yards. Our advice has been to seek prior build­ing sanc­tion plans, as well as fund­ing through fin­an­cial / bank­ing insti­tu­tions.
    Our obser­va­tion is that the cur­rent pri­cing in the area is attract­ive to acquire land, as well as look for­ward to the entire area devel­op­ing into res­id­en­tial hub.
    We do not recom­mend or advise invest­ment into land wherein the land usage hasn’t been defined yet. (or pro­posed under the MPD 2021).
    For a more object­ive advice, please con­nect with our legal con­sult­ants, who can advise you on the spe­cific status of your land, and accord spe­cific advise on the exten­ded Lal dora land.

    Reply  — Quote
  18. Comment by J B Agarwal — June 19, 2009 @ 11:25 am

    I have a plot of 400 yards near sec­tor 21 of Rohini. I had pur­chased it in 2000 and I have come to know that it is not a reg­u­lar colony. It is private colony and not author­ised. Our colony has elec­tri­city con­nec­tion and water sup­plied by col­on­iser. Now I learn that some 1600 colonys being reg­u­lar­ised and our colony name is not there.
    2 – 3 kms ahead in vil­lage kan­jhawla on the same road there is lal dora land where all approvals are being issued. I want advice if I should sell my land and buy in Lal dora? I want to con­struct house and live there after retire­ment. What is dif­fer­ence between both approval and which is safer. Please guide me

    Reply  — Quote
  19. Comment by Expert on MPD- Response to Mr. Ajit Thakur — June 3, 2009 @ 5:24 pm

    Dear Ajit,
    Thanks for appre­ci­at­ing and recom­mend­ing our ini­ti­at­ive for “assim­il­at­ing & dis­pens­ing” inform­a­tion about the Delhi Mas­ter plan 2021.
    Lal Dora land was always dis­tin­guished by a thin divid­ing line between the Urban & Rural areas, which have since blurred with the rapid expan­sion of the Delhi city. There abounds fair con­fu­sion about the status and approvals required under the Lal Dora lands. Let me re-produce here one excerpt from the Expert com­mit­tee report for Lal Dora.(report pub­lished in Jan’2007)
    “Build­ing con­trol reg­u­la­tions were neither pre­scribed nor made effect­ive in Urban vil­lages (lal dora OR exten­ded Lal Dora) under the erro­neous but con­veni­ent assump­tion that since such reg­u­la­tions were not applic­able in the vil­lage abadis, the same would also not apply to urb­an­ized vil­lages as well”.
    Even the sanc­tion­ing author­it­ies seem ‘not so clear’ whether one needs to get the plans approved.
    Our recom­mend­a­tions remain as below:
    a) It is always bet­ter to get the plans approved, archi­tec­tur­ally, struc­tur­ally and from the cor­rect author­it­ies. There is a scheme where a registered archi­tect can self-certify the plans, and sub­mit to author­it­ies later. This was intro­duced to make the sys­tem less cum­ber­some and respons­ive. You could take this route. Either ways, since you plan to build a house for yourselves, you would prefer the best struc­ture.
    b) A registered archi­tect would be able to secure all approvals pre-construction.
    c) If you are not being served with inform­a­tion through the reg­u­lar chan­nels, you could seek through the Right to Inform­a­tion Act. (RTI). File a RTI applic­a­tion and you would likely get the reply from the author­it­ies within 30 days.
    Hope this ful­fils your query.

    Reply  — Quote
  20. Comment by Ajit Thakur — June 3, 2009 @ 3:23 pm

    First, I would like to thank you for your inform­at­ive web­site that provide an insight on the lal dora oppor­tu­it­ies.
    Secondly, I would lik eto inform that I have a small plot (50 sq.yards) in exten­ded lal dora / abadi area in Bur­ari, Delhi — 84 and plan to con­struct a two floor house in near future. I would appre­ci­ate if you could provide me more insight on the fol­low­ing quer­ies:
    1. Is it man­dat­ory to get build­ing plan sanc­tioned from MCD?
     – Accord­ing to the Exec­ut­ive Engin­eer (B) — MCD as the plot is situ­ated in the rural area, it’s not man­dat­ory to get the build­ing plan sanc­tioned. At the same time, the office of EE (B) was unable to provide a writ­ten state­ment or sup­port­ive doc­u­ment and I was advised to con­tact the town plan­ning office of MCD for the same and sub­sequently they too were unable to help me out cit­ing that it’s not in their jur­is­dic­tion.
    2. From where can I get the details related to my query along with the sup­port­ive doc­u­ments and how?
    Your swift response in this con­text would of great assistance

    Reply  — Quote
  21. Comment by Vijay Sadana — June 2, 2009 @ 11:22 am

    I am hav­ing a Affil­i­ated Com­puter Centre in North Delhi’s Shakti Nagar Area which in Zone C. I would request you to please guide me about what should we do to be author­ized as per mas­ter plan. I had a word with Mr. Menon also, he told me that there are some new guidelines regard­ing Com­puter Centre & Coach­ing Centre. please send me the copy of that also.

    Reply  — Quote
  22. Comment by SUBHASH CHAND JAIN — May 30, 2009 @ 11:18 am

    I AM INTERESTED TO KNOW ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE LAND ON L ZONE , VILLAGE TIKRI KALAN ADJOINING P V C MARKET AND KHASRA NO 83/25/1,25/2,84/21 TOTAL LAND 7.0 BIGHAS. PLEASE SPECIFY.

    Reply  — Quote
  23. Comment by Umesh — May 29, 2009 @ 11:21 am

    I would be very keen to know from your expert panel about the “Impact of the recent elec­tions” on the pro­spects for the Delhi mas­ter plan. An edu­cat­ive art­icle from you guys would be very use­ful for investors. Do keep us posted.

    Reply  — Quote
  24. Comment by Gautam Jain — May 18, 2009 @ 5:20 pm

    Dear Sir, I am inter­ested in know­ing the status (Pro­spect) of my Agri­cul­ture land which is loc­ated in P-1 Zone (Alipur Vil­lage) bear­ing
    Khasra no. 28÷12÷2, 28÷19÷1, 102÷19÷1, 20/2, Total (app.) 3 acres. Also pro­spect of exten­ded Lal Dora Land in Alipur Vil­lage
    Pls reply soon
    Regards

    Reply  — Quote
  25. Comment by Akanksha — April 28, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

    A very inform­at­ive site. I am very inter­ested to know the cheapest land avail­ab­il­ity within the 5 cit­ies that are pro­posed to come in new within Delhi.

    Reply  — Quote
  26. Comment by Anil — April 6, 2009 @ 11:17 am

    1. There is no relief in MPD 2021 for plot­ted hous­ing in 250 – 500 sq. mtr plot facing 80 feet road. One extra floor was allowed earlier, the same does not exist now, why?
    2. The noti­fic­a­tions on reg­u­lar­isa­tion of unau­thor­ised con­struc­tions has yiel­ded almost nil res­ults.
    2.1 Why not issue a amnesty scheme for reg­u­lar­isa­tion of unau­thor­ised con­struc­tions at least for upto 5% to 10% in respect of Max­imum height of build­ing and FAR. This little step will help many.
    2.2 How­ever, a gen­eral amnesty scheme to reg­u­lar­ise all con­struc­tions which are more than 5 years old on as is where is basis by levy­ing one time pen­alty will bring in lot of cheers for del­hites and plenty of money with DDA/MCD and this money will work as a cata­lyst in speed­ing up 2010 com­mon­wealth games infra­struc­ture. URGENT ACTION NEEDED.
    3. Care should be taken by DDA/MCD and del­hites that such unau­thor­ised con­struc­tions do not come up later.

    Reply  — Quote
  27. Comment by Manjari — March 31, 2009 @ 11:16 am

    Can a man­age­ment pro­fes­sional run the office from the res­id­en­tial zone in south delhi at GK II

    Reply  — Quote
  28. Comment by Umesh Das — March 28, 2009 @ 11:14 am

    Sir,
    Where can I get MPD 2021?

    Reply  — Quote
  29. Comment by Chitranjan Singh — February 13, 2009 @ 1:13 pm

    How­ever much we may appre­ci­ate and go gaga over the MPD ‚unless there is a steely imple­ment­a­tion and strict adher­ence to the By laws and other build­ing norms the day is not far when we shall see the entire cap­ital out­side the LUYTENS ZONE becom­ing unhab­it­able!
    Can we have a more crim­inal dis­crim­in­a­tion being per­per­trated by our own lead­ers NICELY SECURE AND BEAUTIFUL LUYTENS DELHI for the polit­ical mas­ters and the babus and SLUMDOG LIVING For the laity bey­ond the LUYTENS!Why no body com­men­ted on that!These times are worse then Pre inde­pend­ant India ‚now we have our own brand of colonizers!Why dont we allow mixed land use for LUYTENS BANGLOW ZONE! or elim­in­ate at alto­gether and let the votar­ies of mix land use stay in areas out­side this pro­tec­ted Zone and then see if there heart still bleeds for the com­mon man for whom they are never tired of mak­ing whole of Delhi a mixed land use — in the name of liv­li­hood for the masses!
    God bless my Delhi and the MPD

    Reply  — Quote
  30. Comment by Chitranjan Singh — February 13, 2009 @ 12:11 pm

    Hi Dear !
    U guys are indeed doing a great job of edu­cat­ing people about the intrigues and intric­a­cies of MPD.
    Here is another intirgue I request u to help me unravel!
    What are the norms for build­ing a Farm house in Delhi and the slew of sanc­tions and per­mis­sions and the author­it­ies to deal with.
    Pl do advise
    thanks very much
    chits

    Reply  — Quote
  31. Comment by Sugeet Sharmma — February 9, 2009 @ 11:10 am

    The recent relax­a­tion of norms in the FDI — how would it impact the Delhi mas­ter plan??
    As an avid reader of the com­ments of the edit­or­ial team of this web­site, I would like to have some insight into the same.
    I can hope­fully use that inform­a­tion to think through my invest­ments under the Delhi mas­ter plan.
    Please share your insights.
    Thanks. SS

    Reply  — Quote
  32. Comment by Ajay Dabas — February 9, 2009 @ 11:09 am

    The news pub­lished about the floor registry being allowed in Gur­gaon def­in­itely is going to act as a dampener for the apart­ments and pro­jects in Gur­gaon. COupled with the large sup­ply that Delhi is going to throw up, I am sure that the prices in Gur­gaon are headed towards some major cor­rec­tion. But, the land prices in Delhi are so luc­rat­ive cur­rently that the Gur­gaon prices, how­ever much it may cor­rect, can­not match Delhi prices. Invest­ing in Delhi makes much more sense that going to Gur­gaon. And invest­ments into infra­struc­ture in Delhi is any day much bet­ter than in Gur­gaon. My Thumbs up for the Delhi mas­ter plan.

    Reply  — Quote
  33. Comment by Deepak Batra — January 31, 2009 @ 11:07 am

    Let me put on record my appre­ci­ation for the valu­able guid­ance provided by mr.Menon. I must appre­ci­ate the hon­esty and sin­cer­ity about the advise. This is exactly what we want to develop our prop­er­ties in the Delhi mas­ter plan.

    Reply  — Quote
  34. Comment by Anand — August 7, 2008 @ 10:53 am

    Zone D plans MPD 2021 have not been finalised/ noti­fied to date how­ever the author­it­ies keep on issu­ing noti­fic­a­tions chan­ging the land use of select pock­ets of land. Recent noti­fic­a­tion was dated 13.09.2008 and is avail­able on the DDA website.

    Reply  — Quote
  35. Comment by Aditi Pal — August 6, 2008 @ 3:52 pm

    Dear Mr. Menon,
    I was extremely sur­prised when you told us yes­ter­day that there is almost 60k hec­tares of land which will come up for devel­op­ment in Delhi. We were all along under the impres­sion that there is hardly any land in Delhi. Like my boss said, we were under the impres­sion that a few colon­ies wou be redeveloped. The insight shared by you is indeed tre­mend­ous and the inform­a­tion pos­ted here is very informative.

    Reply  — Quote
  36. Comment by Amitosh Mishra — July 29, 2008 @ 12:51 pm

    Hi Ramesh,
    I dont know if you are the same Ramesh Menon I know from Gur­gaon. Just browsed through the latest of Delhi and saw your name in the con­tact details. If we know each other then please sen me a mail. I am based in Mum­bai now.

    Reply  — Quote
  37. Comment by Advocate Manish Kadyan — July 28, 2008 @ 5:45 pm

    well its a nice effort and it will take some time to get imple­men­ted as we are in a habbit of daily viol­a­tions and infringe­ments of build­ing bye laws and other applicaqble laws. The main prob­lem behind that scenerio is lack of aware­ness among the gen­ral people of Delhi and the second thing is non co-operative beha­viour of the offi­cials just to heat up the pock­ets.
    Accord­ing to me there should be any mean of express­ing views on line on every plan od Delhi devel­op­ment so that we can activaly par­ti­cip­ate and time to keep on provid­ing our sug­ges­tions because this planned devel­op­ment is being done for us only.

    Reply  — Quote
  38. Comment by Ruchika — July 28, 2008 @ 12:40 pm

    This is a hil­ari­ous post that I saw writ­ten by my col­league on his blog­spot http://www.ramesh-menon.com
    — —  —  —  — —
    Iron­ical, as it may sound, but, the much maligned and cri­ti­cised Delhi mas­ter plan MPD 2021 is get­ting global recog­ni­tion; and all for the right reas­ons.
    I am given to under­stand that there was this com­pet­i­tion on urban plan­ning in Mad­rid, Spain, where our very own DDA also had sub­mit­ted the plans of the pro­posed Delhi mas­ter plan MPD 2021. The jury seemed to have debated on how the hell did these guys with all their polit­ics and “lemming-ed atit­ude” still man­age to win the coveted “2008 ISOCARP Award for Excel­lence for Mas­ter Plan for Delhi 2021”.
    Unfor­tu­nately, here in India, a mot­ley crew of experts debate on how Mas­ter plans are myriad tools for exploit­a­tion, and how we need to remain a coun­try of snake charm­ers, and ratholes…. keep harp­ing about (lip ser­vice only) about the Indira Gandhi pur­por­ted “Garibi Hatao” andolan, rather than cre­ate aven­ues for improv­ing the qual­ity of life.
    I am for one, not pur­port­ing or sub­scrib­ing in the entirety the pro­pos­als of the Delhi mas­ter plan. Hav­ing researched it over the past few months, and hav­ing assisted investors take pos­i­tions for profit under the Delhi mas­ter plan, I am aware of the many lacunaes and neg­at­ives, but, the spirit under which many of the plan­ners have worked on it is not lost on any­one.
    Another con­sid­er­a­tion of this irony is that many of the awar­ded plans might see imme­di­ate devel­op­ment, and accol­ades showered in thier par­ent nations. While, we Del­hiites, kan­gresis, Bhartiya Jhagda party (BJP), H-amar singh, Dal­its, Rajputs, Reli­gious lead­ers, world lead­ers, desi liquor vendors, black-marketeers, ter­ror groups, people pee­ing on the streets, cows & equally ‘buf­falo atti­tude jay-walkers’ and con­cenrned and non con­cerned would all debate on how mas­ter plan­ning and devel­op­ment is anti nation­al­ism, and against our ‘rich her­it­age’. Ulti­mately, the supreme court would delve and deliver some sane dir­ec­tion. So much so for all the hard-work of the mas­ter plan­ners.
    Let us com­mend ourselves on the depth of the intel­lec­tual cap­ital we have, in India, besides being the “BPO of the world”. Given the will and intent, we can account for social, eco­nomic and well­ness ini­ti­at­ives which can be at par with the world.
    Hear ye Politicos!!!!! Please hear the humble cit­izen clam­our­ing to walk up the qual­ity of life lad­der, without many of you pre­tend­ing to help us reach there. Minus your help, we might climb faster.
    Kudos, town plan­ners, who were part of the Delhi mas­ter plan MPD 2021.

    Reply  — Quote
  39. Comment by Sandeep Pahwa — July 28, 2008 @ 10:38 am

    I seem to get a good feel about what is being planned for Delhi for the future. What I espe­cially like is the spirit behind it. It seems, we are finally wak­ing out of our ‘con­stant mode of denial’ and ‘false sense of social­ism’ which tells us to play Robin hood, rather than policy makers

    Reply  — Quote
  40. Comment by Sunny Shah, Dubai. — July 27, 2008 @ 4:37 pm

    Thanks for all the inputs given by you on the web­site and on e-mail. What I would really like to under­stand is how long would all of this take? As an NRI, we are always appre­hens­ive about the polit­ical aspect of all such devel­op­ments. We keep wor­ry­ing that announce­ments hap­pen imme­di­ately, but the fol­low up action some­times takes years.
    The pos­it­ive part is that I have been able to invest into some land in Delhi, at almost the same prices being quoted for land almost 100 kms away. The reas­on­ing was very easy. People would still be will­ing to pay a premium to buy in Delhi com­pared to Neem­rana, or Jhaj­jar or any other place which would grow at a much slower pace com­pared to Delhi.
    I also am look­ing for someone to co-develop prop­er­ties that I have acquired.

    Reply  — Quote
  41. Comment by Anand Aggarwal, Residential developer & Investor — July 27, 2008 @ 1:36 pm

    I see the emer­gence of the Delhi mas­ter plan as some­thing ‘much delayed’. There was so much of a pent up demand for qual­ity hous­ing and work place in Delhi. If only these needs were addressed earlier, many a sub­urbs like Gur­gaon and Noida would not have grown as fast. Come what mat, an address in Delhi has its own charm, and no Gur­gaon can ful­fil it. What we require is real lux­ury homes in Delhi – not the over-priced vari­ety that we have today, but apart­ments which really are lux­ury. Given the option, I would shift back to Delhi

    Reply  — Quote
  42. Comment by Ajay Dabas — July 27, 2008 @ 10:24 am

    I returned to India a few years back after lead­ing most of my child­hood & Adult­hood years in USA & Canada. I was mostly crit­ical of the haphaz­ard devel­op­ment (or rather the lack of it) in Delhi. I always used to com­pare it with the cap­it­als of the many coun­tries I have had to stay in. Now that I rep­res­ent the real estate industry, and have the oppor­tun­ity to research and invest in, I am much bullish about the Delhi mas­ter plan. I have inves­ted my sav­ings into land assets and so far it has yiel­ded the desired appre­ci­ation. What I look for­ward to is the large scale devel­op­ment and cre­ation of new town­ships in Delhi, which should change the face of Delhi. I have always tried to invest in land where there is good con­nectiv­ity & being on the Metro map. There­fore, most of my invest­ments are con­cen­trated around the Kan­jhawla belt & Najafgarh areas

    Reply  — Quote
  43. Comment by Joseph Sam — July 26, 2008 @ 3:34 pm

    Hav­ing done con­sid­er­able research on the demo­graphic aspir­a­tions of Delhi, I see an immin­ent explo­sion in the num­ber of people migrat­ing to Delhi, as well as their demand for bet­ter stand­ards of liv­ing. The Delhi mas­ter plan seems to be stitch in time as it aims to bring in many more acres into devel­op­ment. Besides, the pro­posal for amal­gam­a­tion and re-development of exist­ing areas is a well thought out strategy to mod­ern­ise the city. I wish and hope that some revolu­tion­ary steps are ini­ti­ated for the widen­ing of roads, the encroach­ment, and civic facil­it­ies in the exist­ing areas. Without doubt, the new cit­ies would evolve bet­ter. One word of cau­tion would be to reg­u­late the new devel­op­ments, rather than to allow rampant free­dom to the private players.

    Reply  — Quote
  44. Comment by Praveen Dabas, Film actor — July 26, 2008 @ 11:21 am

    As a keen watcher of the pro­gress of Delhi, I am heartened by the pro­posed devel­op­ments in my ances­tral vil­lage of Kan­jhawla. My brother Ajay Dabas tells me that it would be one of the most prom­ising areas under the new mas­ter plan of Delhi. There would be express­ways, metro, leis­ure zones, cul­ture and her­it­age centres spread on almost 150 acres, IT hubs etc. in the area. I am also told that the space starved West & North-west Delhi can look for­ward to spa­cious farm house liv­ing, in that area, in the future. Devel­op­ment is most welcome !!!

    Reply  — Quote
  45. Comment by Harish Gahlot, Developer & Land consolidator — July 26, 2008 @ 9:22 am

    The Delhi mas­ter plan, though for­ward look­ing, would take a very long time to fructify. It has to start from level zero, whereas, the invest­ments in Gur­gaon mas­ter plan would fructify faster. It is my obser­va­tion that Gur­gaon has had a head start, and would con­tinue to retain its lead­er­ship. Also, some of the prices as being quoted is absurd. Unless more logical pri­cing and devel­op­ment levels are tar­geted by Delhi, I do not see the spurt being very large

    Reply  — Quote
  46. Comment by Harry Singh, Director, Trustbanq Realty Limited — July 25, 2008 @ 5:19 pm

    I have been track­ing the pro­gress (or the lack of it) on the MPD 2021, with keen interest. The very fact that the policy doc­u­ment itself would be delayed by a few years, doesn’t augur well. The sup­ply side was always weak in Delhi, in almost all product seg­ments. In fact, the fact that Delhi didn’t offer much helped cit­ies like Gur­gaon, Noida, Faridabad to scale up the value offer­ing.
    I am much enthused by the new offer­ings from vari­ous developers, more so since Delhi mas­ter plan would offer higher FSI, removal of height restric­tions, encour­age private par­ti­cip­a­tion, redevel­op­ment of exist­ing con­ges­ted areas etc.
    A lot would depend on the polit­ical will, expedi­ency and par­ti­cip­at­ory nature of the devel­op­ment pro­posed by the government.I look for­ward to the suc­cess­ful intro­duc­tion of the ‘single win­dow clear­ance’ for all pro­jects, so that devel­op­ment pace can be gauged.
    Delhi mas­ter plan 2021 would be in the con­sumer interest if the infra­struc­ture and products are sim­ul­tan­eously created.

    Reply  — Quote
  47. Comment by Sarabjit Singh, Realtor, Washington Area (Long & Foster School) — July 25, 2008 @ 3:18 pm

    Every ini­ti­at­ive is fraught with the risk of overt cri­ti­cism from a few quar­ters. So, would the Delhi Mas­ter plan 2021 also. I have gone through the sali­ent high­lights of the pro­posed mas­ter plan and do find it for­ward look­ing. Espe­cially, that sec­tion where devel­op­ment dens­ity is pro­posed along­side the trans­port­a­tion cor­ridors. . This would mean that real estate devel­op­ment, infra­struc­ture and trans­port­a­tion facil­it­ies would develop, in con­junc­tion.
    I am also par­tic­u­larly impressed by the scale of the Pub­lic: Private part­ner­ship pro­posed. This would neces­sar­ily mean bet­ter cash flows into devel­op­ment, as well as a bet­ter char­ac­ter to the devel­op­ment.
    It is an oppor­tun­ity of long term invest­ment, which I would recommend

    Reply  — Quote
  48. Comment by AMIT SONI — July 7, 2008 @ 5:13 pm

    I like the idea that the Delhi gov­ern­ment seems to be work­ing on as far as cre­at­ing dif­fer­ent zones. WHat is inter­est­ing is that the plan­ners are tak­ing into account the future pop­u­la­tion explo­sion and migra­tion into account. I would be keen to know which are the areas defined by the gov­ern­ment wherein there would be large expanses of green and a very peace­ful stand­ards of liv­ing? Can you please also throw some light on how is the gov­ern­ment plan­ning to meet the energy chal­lenges.
    Amit — Cata­batic Technologies.

    Reply  — Quote
  49. Comment by Joseph Sam — July 7, 2008 @ 10:17 am

    Would you have any stud­ies on the dem­p­graphic pro­jec­tions for the respect­ive zones? I am keen to know on how the mas­ter plan of Delhi is planned for dif­fer­ent seg­ments of hab­it­ants. You could con­tact me dir­ectly on mail and let me know as I am keen to invest into land.

    Reply  — Quote

Leave a comment

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro